Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Talk about any aspect of the films.

Moderators: daughter of the King, The Rose-Tree Dryad

Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Postby JFG II » May 29, 2019 10:34 am

Polly, Digory, Peter, Susan, Edmund, Lucy, Shasta, Aravis, Caspian, Eustace, Jill & Tirian: There are 12 main human characters in The Chronicles. All are different ages. Or so we all thought. I’m interested in this topic, one that’s been posted elsewhere already. However, this time, I wish to focus on what we Narnia fans will expect from the Netflix adaptations, regarding the different ages of the child characters from the books.

As a kid reading the series, I imagined Peter in LWW was about 12 years old, Shasta & Aravis in HHB were both about 12, Digory & Polly in MN were both about 10 years old, and Eustace & Jill in SC both about 12... and then 13 in LB

I was surprised when I read C.S. Lewis’s timeline, which implied Jill & Eustace we’re both 9 years old in SC instead of 12 (and 16 in LB instead of 13), while Shasta is 14-15 years old, instead of 12 (he’s older than Peter in LWW, who’s 13.)

[Also, the timeline itself is different than what I imagined as a kid: Instead of LB taking place 1 year after SC, which I thought takes place 1 year after VDT, LB takes place 7 WHOLE YEARS after SC, which itself takes place only a few weeks after VDT.]

If those are the ages Lewis imagined for the characters, I will accept that. However, I am not at all obligated to, because Lewis never actually states the ages of the characters, leaving it to the imagination (except for Tirian who’s 20-25 in LB which is around Peter’s age in that book).

I hope the Netflix adaptations bring some variety and purpose to the different ages of the kids, particularly if they decide to film the books in chronological order.

One such possibility:

MN (2020)
Digory & Polly: 13 & 12 years old

LWW (2021)
Peter & Susan: 14 & 13 years old
Edmund & Lucy: 11 & 9 years old

HHB (2022)
Shasta & Aravis: 15 & 14 years old

PC (2023)
Peter, Susan & Caspian: 16 & 15 & 16 years old
Edmund & Lucy: 13 & 11 years old

VDT (2024)
Caspian: 17 years old
Edmund & Lucy: 14 & 12 years old
Eustace: 11 years old

SC (2025)
Jill & Eustace: Both 12 years old
Caspian Cameo: 18 years old

LB (2026)
Tirian: 20 years old
Jill & Eustace: Both 13 years old
(Acting Cameos:)
Digory & Polly: 19 & 18 years old
Peter & Susan & Caspian: 19 & 18 & 19 years old
Edmund & Lucy: 16 & 14 years old
Shasta & Aravis: 19 & 18 years old

And that’s assuming the same acting kids reprise their roles in all adaptations!
Sorry, this is so long. I’m done now, thanks! :ymblushing: :ymblushing:
JFG II
NarniaWeb Regular
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Feb 16, 2019
Gender: Male

Re: Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Postby decarus » Jun 23, 2019 7:05 am

I think making the characters teenagers at the very least is the way to go. I think that if they go all the way through all the stories, the goal would be that the actors not change too much over the time, so that they are recognizable when they meet Aslan in The Last Battle. I like the idea of Lucy being younger, but, in general, child actors are terrible and then become worse before they get better. For me, that means that even if they cast well for Lucy, she is going to get steadily worse as the seasons go on and they should try to take that into account by having some older actors that can hold their own against the problem of the younger actors.

Though, I really would rather them not have the characters to be too old. Caspian was way too old in the movie, but the Pevensies were the right age as was Eustace, though he could be a little older, but Caspian was nearly thirty which was way too old.
There are no clouds in the sky. There is only the open sun and the Lord watches.
decarus
NarniaWeb Guru
 
Posts: 1987
Joined: Feb 29, 2008
Location: Averalaan

Re: Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Postby coracle » Jun 23, 2019 10:16 am

Goodness, what have you got against child actors? :-\

In my experience, when they hit adolescence the lovely natural child actors get rather stiff and unreal, and just can't do what they did at 9 or 10. In which case, using young teens as children is awful.

Far better to have good child actors who are well trained and still know how to be natural. I've watched a lot of good BBC children's serials over the years, and back in the 70s they stuck to the young ages, instead of the 90s productions using adolescents of 14 or 15 who just look wrong playing as little kids.

Will Poulter was an exception: he was in his mid teens by the time they filmed VDT, but mercifully he'd not done his growing yet, or they would have had to cast another Eustace. He delivered a believable child character who was supposed to be younger than Lucy.

Caspian was meant to be the same age as Peter. The casting director had problems finding the right teenager, and ended up getting an adult in his late 20s, who'd been a child actor earlier on.
"Blessed are you, Lord our God, king of the universe, who diversified his creatures" (a Jewish prayer to be said whenever one sees an unusual looking person or animal),
User avatar
coracle
Moderator
NarniaWeb's Auntie
 
Posts: 19866
Joined: Feb 10, 2004
Location: England
Gender: Female

Re: Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Postby Cleander » Jun 23, 2019 7:09 pm

coracle wrote:Goodness, what have you got against child actors? :-\

In my experience, when they hit adolescence the lovely natural child actors get rather stiff and unreal, and just can't do what they did at 9 or 10. In which case, using young teens as children is awful.

Far better to have good child actors who are well trained and still know how to be natural..


I may risk angering a lot of fellow fans by saying this, but I think this happened with Georgie Henley in VDT. She was SO good in the first two, but I think she eventually got more into "acting" rather than truly being the character. I suppose poor writing may have also had something to do with this, but it seemed like she was a little more forced than before.
PM me to join the Search for the Seven Swords!
Co-founder of the newly restored Edmund Club! Find it on the Talk About Narnia Forum!
Image
signature by aileth
User avatar
Cleander
NarniaWeb Nut
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Oct 25, 2018
Location: Swimming across the moat of Cair Paravel
Gender: Male

Re: Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Postby jewel » Jun 23, 2019 7:26 pm

For me, it's good either way. But the children in the pictures of the books do look much younger than those in the Disney movies.
While this maybe off topic, I wish they had added more well known cast into the Narnia movies.
User avatar
jewel
NarniaWeb Nut
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Apr 21, 2013
Location: knoxville
Gender: Male

Re: Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Postby decarus » Jun 24, 2019 5:09 am

It is nothing against child actors. I just think that when they are young they are just doing it and if you find the right kid and have good direction then it works, but then they get a little older and go through what everyone goes through and they either get bored of the process or they get stuck in their head and not in the moment. It isn't about them as an individual person, but just having to go through the process of growing up while working must be a lot.

I also think that Georgie Henley got worse as it went on. Which is not a knock against her. Acting is hard and when they are in the awkward age, there is little chance that they will be able to do anything great at that time. Just think about the Harry Potter kids, who got bored for awhile and then stuck in their head for awhile, or like Henry from Once Upon A time, who got really bored of the process and never really got back into it.

All I was trying to say was that they need to have some older actors to counterbalance having the younger ones who won't be able to hold their own in the same way as they get older. That is just something they should think about when casting for age that maybe having the kids be a little older and more settled as actors is not a bad thing.

I, also, get why they picked Ben to play Caspian, but he was way too old and it never worked for me, especially as a counter to Peter which hopefully they will not do again and as a love interest to Susan which please let's hope they never do again.
There are no clouds in the sky. There is only the open sun and the Lord watches.
decarus
NarniaWeb Guru
 
Posts: 1987
Joined: Feb 29, 2008
Location: Averalaan

Re: Ages of the Kids - Books vs Adaptations

Postby fantasia » Jun 24, 2019 7:59 am

I'm less concerned about a specific age than I am about ages relative to other characters.
Almost all of the Walden character actors were spot on, with the exception of Ben Barnes as Caspian in PC (he was a perfect age in VDT). I want Caspian in PC to be Edmund's age, not older than Peter. It changed the whole dynamic of how he interacted with the Pevensies.
I think Shasta and Aravis could stand to be older, like 16ish. Digory and Polly I'd like to see younger, around 10 where Lewis puts them.
User avatar
fantasia
Site Admin
The Watchful Admin
 
Posts: 18632
Joined: Feb 06, 2004
Location: Kansas
Gender: Female


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests