Ronny, you are not making a lot of sense.
For instance, I bring up the following two instances from previous posts of yours.
You wrote:Maybe because he wanted to establish, right from the start, that Shift was a duplicitous, blasphemous charlatan, a false prophet and make the reader hate him right away.
He is, after all, the one mainly responsible for the end of Narnia. I think Lewis probably didn't want any ambiguity about it. Shift is the villain and he wants us to identify him as such right away.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3925&p=188289#p188289You also say:
You wrote:Maybe they put her in VotD because it actually lacks a decent antagonist. Jadis and Shift are about the only two really brilliant villains in the series.
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1833&p=133913#p133913__________
Now, there's the distinct possibility that your opinion and worldview has drastically changed within the time since you posted these. . . otherwise, you're whole argument doesn't make a ton of sense.
You call Jadis and Shift villains, and you draw (what society would term) "bad/evil" conclusions about Shift's character. If there are no absolutes, then why are they villains? If there are no absolutes, then why are they bad?
And as far as Aslan goes. . . what other character in the books sacrifices their life for another? And how does that draw glory to Aslan who, admittedly wasn't positive that the Deep Magic would resurrect him, as is evidenced by the line:
Aslan wrote:I knew of the old incantation, but it has never been put to the test until now.
Lucy or Susan (I cannot remember which) then go on to say that Aslan took a great risk for Edmund. . . for a traitor.
I think that that's a lot more "good" than your blessed White Witch who attempts to slit Edmund's throat to suit her own needs.
Also. . . if absolutes don't exist, what gives you the authority to make these claims?