This forum has been archived. Please visit the new forum at https://community.narniaweb.com/

Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

The community lounge for non-Narnian discussions.

Moderators: stargazer, johobbit

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Pattertwigs Pal » Aug 01, 2010 10:22 am

Yeah! I finally got caught up with reading posts (on the old thread and this new thread). :D :ymparty: \:D/ (sorry it feels like a major accomplishment).

Thanks TBG for answering my question about the ELCA (back on page 81 of the old thread). I've decided not to go to an ELCA church after I move (which will be happening toward the end of the month). I'm actually going to be moving into the same apartment complex as my friend, so I'll be going to her church. That way I'll know someone there. (I did check out the churches beliefs too.)

Andrew, I have a quick (or so I hope question) question about your worldview. Based on your worldview, should there be laws and rules or not? In other words, what would a society made up of people that have the same worldview as you look like?


Eustace + Jill, I'm not ignoring your question; I don't have answer. I will be interested in reading other people's answers though.
Image
Silver Chair Reading Group
NW sister to Movie Aristotle & daughter of the King
User avatar
Pattertwigs Pal
Moderator
Cookie Queen of NarniaWeb
 
Posts: 5262
Joined: May 16, 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Benjamin » Aug 01, 2010 11:38 am

Eustace+Jill wrote:Hey, I had a question! :)
I don't really know what my opinion on this is yet, so I wanted to find out what you guys thought. I was wondering, (from a Christian, Bible-believing viewpoint) does God love non-Christians?

Yes, I strongly believe with NO DOUBT that God loves every person on earth! Christian or non-Christian. He does not love evil but He certainly loves the person!

Plus, are there any scriptures that tells Christians to love non-Christians? I was wondering, because I've found many that say to love fellow-Christians, but I haven't found any that say to love non-believers.

Should we hate anyone? I think we would both agree that we should not! You should hate the evil that is in them, for you are to hate evil, but not the person!
You see when I pray for non-believers, there is this love that wells up inside of me! I can't really explain it but there is this love for them like the love of God that just overwhelms me!
So to love the actual person with God's love is certainly what we should do! But do not love the evil in them.

I hope that's helps :)


--Benjamin
Image
Avvie By Flambeau Sig by Ithilwen
Team Hoodie!!
User avatar
Benjamin
NarniaWeb Fanatic
 
Posts: 3199
Joined: Mar 07, 2009
Location: Flying on Appa somewheres...
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Kate » Aug 01, 2010 2:33 pm

Well, some of the most well-known verses in the Bible are about love.
Let's plop down good old John 3:16:
John 3:16 wrote:16For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
This verse says God loves the whole world (I know you were talking about individuals, but is it really different if He loves all of them or just each one individually? The addition is the same). It says he gave his son for them and then that some of them will believe and be saved. It doesn't say that "God gave his son that whoever believes in him shall have eternal life and be loved by God."

The command to "love your neighbor as yourself" spans as far back as Leviticus. It doesn't specify who your neighbor is.
The greatest argument (is it an argument if there isn't a counter argument?) for loving non-Christians is Jesus' example. He loved the Samaritan woman, the syrophonecian woman, Nicodemus, Zaccheus, he fed 5000 people and had pity on them because they "were like sheep without a shepherd." He loved people from every background and religion. Many of them were so shocked by his brand of love (true, real, Godly love that isn't dependent on who you are) that they wanted it in their own lives and became followers of Jesus. I believe that as followers of Jesus, we are called to the same kind of love. (Though it's so much easier said than done).
Image
User avatar
Kate
Moderator Emeritus
DJ Mod
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Location: Narnia
Gender: Female

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby The Black Glove » Aug 01, 2010 4:25 pm

I know you were talking about individuals, but is it really different if He loves all of them or just each one individually? The addition is the same


You miss the point of the verse. To say that the verse means that "God loves everyone the same" is to take it out of the context of the rest of the Scriptures and out of the cultural context in which Jesus said it.

A Jewish reader, upon hearing this, would have been shocked. His response would have been, "Wait a minute! You mean that God loves Greeks? Samaritans? Babylonians? You mean that God can save them?" What it does not mean is that every single person in the universe is loved in the same way.

There is, naturally, a way in which God loves all people as His creation and as His image-bearers. This is why we as Christians are to love people unconditionally (though we are to take care of our own first). However, this does not negate the fact that God continually says that He hates the wicked and will judge them. The reason that we do not is because that is God's prerogative.

God loves us, His people, in a way that He does not love everyone else which is why He chose us from before the foundation of the world (Eph 1:4-5). It wasn't because we were any holier or better than anyone else, but because it was His good pleasure.

TBG
Whereof we speak, thereof we cannot be silent.
If God did not exist, we would be unable to invent Him.
User avatar
The Black Glove
Moderator Emeritus
 
Posts: 6453
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: Virginia
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Dr Elwin Ransom » Aug 01, 2010 6:19 pm

Eustace+Jill, you seem to have entered the discussion with no small goals in mind! :D This is quite a deep question, and I hope to God (literally) that below I can ask some questions, and give some reminders, with both Grace and Truth.

Among most Christians, the default practice is to say (as some have said here!) that "God loves everyone." But too often we stop there and don't further consider what that means, or if we should equally remember other truths about God's nature. If we don't consider this, we risk a few problems, both about how we think about God and how we live.

A few questions about the partial (not false, just partial) concept of "God is love," but mostly about the idea that God loves without discrimination, and that He loves everyone in exactly the same way. What do you think?

1. What about the narratives in Scripture in which God tells the Israelites to kill their enemies? As James White (just a bit rhetorically) asks:

James White wrote:Is anyone seriously going to argue that God loved the Egyptian foot soldier crushed under the falling waters of the Red Sea in the same way He loved Moses, who passed safely through the sea? That He loved the pagan Canaanite priest wiped out by the Israelites as they moved through the Promised Land to the same degree that He loved Joshua? That He loved the captain of the Assyrian army He used to chasten Israel in the same fashion He loved the prophet Isaiah?


2. Do human beings have the ability to "veto" God's love? If so, might this call into question all of God's claims to be all-powerful and sovereign?

3. What about Romans 9, in which Paul, quoting Old-Testament passages, clearly says that God at least has a precedent of loving some, and hating others, for His own good purposes? We cannot forget that God is love, but we also can't forget harder truths about Him, as Paul wrote about:

As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”

What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part? By no means! For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”

That's Romans 9: 13-15. Tough stuff, but somehow this is just as true as John 3:16 and other passages that talk about God loving the world.

4. Does "world" (kosmos) in John 3:16 truly mean everyone in the world? Or do reminders such as The Black Glove's also figure in?

5. Jesus goes on in John 3 to talk about how He did not come to condemn the whole world. However, He says, those who reject Him are already condemned. This could give us a clue that "God so loved the world" may not mean He loves every single person who is in the world the exact same way. Question: Does God love those who are "condemned already" just as much as He loves those who love His light and truth? From verses 17-19:

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil.

6. What about the doctrine of "common grace"? Jesus in His famous Sermon on the Mount says that God the Father "makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust" (Matthew 5:45). Is this not also a Biblical truth that God loves people that does not require Christians to believe (or imply) that "God loves everyone exactly the same"? (I'm also reminded of how this truth could be shown in The Magician's Nephew, when Aslan loves the dumb beasts -- but blesses them in a different way by allowing them to cared for by the free, intelligent beasts to whom He has given speech.)

7. In saying only "God is love," or that Jesus was loving to people -- both very true statements! -- might we by accident forget that very often God/Christ did not "act" very loving to people? Take the above-mentioned Egyptians, or the Pharisees, or Jesus with the rich man (Mark 10). One of Jesus' worse condemnations was made not to the Pharisees, but to other "average" people -- at the end of John 8, He calls them the Devil's children and accuses them (rightly) of not believing in Him.

(It could seem risky, compiling all these verses that on their own could make God or Jesus seem unreasonably mean. I only do this because it shows another "side" -- Christians dare not only focus on, or imply to others, that Jesus loved everyone and had nothing hard to say to them.)

8. Does God change "modes" between now -- when, as it's said, He's loving everyone exactly the same -- and the future, in which He will judge the wicked and sentence them to eternal, conscious suffering for their hatred of Him? Did He once love rebel humans, and then stop loving them? Or does He even now love the people who are suffering in Hell?

9. What does Scripture say about those for whom Jesus died? Was His sacrificial death really "in place" of those people, as many passages testify? Or did He die for every person, yet they veto it applying to them?

(This could be a fine distinction, for Christians as God's people don't know either way who will and won't be saved. That's why we preach the Gospel to as many people as we can find! It's also not meant to imply that Jesus' death was not sufficient to save everyone. But does Scripture say He died to set up a "system" of salvation, or to actually save people?)

10. The popular slogan Love the sinner, hate the sin may be close to the truth that God wants us to show His love to all in different ways, and not act self-righteous (as if we somehow earned our own salvation and they haven't). But does God Himself "love the sinner, hate the sin"?

Randy Alcorn wrote:God states a reason for his pleasure in his Son: "You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness" (Hebrews 1:9). If we imagine God only loves and doesn't hate, we will think he calls upon us to only love. Yet he commands us, "Hate evil, love good" (Amos 5:15).

God's attributes of holiness, purity, and righteousness prompt him to hate evil, including some human attitudes and actions; and yes, even some people (see Deuteronomy 12:31; Proverbs 6:16-19; Jeremiah 44:4; Malachi 1:2-3). David writes, "He [God] is angry with the wicked every day" (Psalm 7:11, NLT). David also says, "You are not a God who takes pleasure in evil; with you the wicked cannot dwell. The arrogant cannot stand in your presence; you hate all who do wrong. You destroy those who tell lies; bloodthirsty and deceitful men the LORD abhors" (Psalm 5:4-6).

These statements make clear that our loving God won't allow the wicked to dwell in his presence. Certainly, he hates sin, but passages such as this go further by saying, "You hate all who do wrong." If we place God's love above his holiness, such statements will seem appalling. And they will seem especially jarring when we hear John, the "apostle of love," say something like, "Whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath remains [present tense] on him" (John 3:36).

from If God is Good; all brackets in original, but my own emphases added

These are sobering questions and truths, and I don't mean to raise such issues lightly. Nor do I mean to imply that all Christians should have the exact same views on this, or else they're not "spiritual" enough (or worse still, not Christians), or nonsense such as that.

Still, I have known some people who have only ever been taught, or think about, God is love. Then suffering and death hits them, or they somehow wake up and find all the Scripture passages in which God has asked the Israelites to wipe out their enemies. Or they may even read Romans 8 to 9, especially 9, and see the precedent that God sets with loving Jacob and hating Esau (and Paul later asks even tougher questions, in Romans 9: 22-24). And instead of remembering that God is God, and we are not, and we cannot answer back to Him, as Paul says, some people resent God for having this right and nature -- even those who admit He exists.

I know of at least one case in which a real-life evangelical person, born and raised in Christianity, somehow figured out for the first time that God is also a God of holiness and justice. This person could not understand that -- he'd somehow "missed" it -- so he rejected Christianity altogether.

In popular Christianity, I worry that many people are thinking the same way. While God is sovereign even over their false conversions, it is also up to Christians to choose to preach the whole truth about His nature.
Image

Speculative Faith
Exploring epic stories for God's glory.
Blogs, guest authors, novel reviews, and features on hot fiction topics.
User avatar
Dr Elwin Ransom
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus, "... and he almost deserved it."
 
Posts: 3279
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
Location: United States
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Mother-Music » Aug 01, 2010 7:47 pm

Eustace+Jill wrote:Hey, I had a question! :)
I don't really know what my opinion on this is yet, so I wanted to find out what you guys thought. I was wondering, (from a Christian, Bible-believing viewpoint) does God love non-Christians? I don't mean the world in general, or all people in general. I mean an individual who is not a Christian. (I don't know if that makes any difference whether it's one person or a mass, but just in case it makes a difference, I thought I'd specify)
I was wondering because I have seen scriptures that make it sound like he does (since he sent His son to die for them), and other scriptures that sound like he doesn't (because without Jesus's blood to cover them, he can't see past their sins). I don't believe that the Bible contradicts itself or anything like that. And I believe the Bible absolutely. I was just wondering what it meant. :)
Plus, are there any scriptures that tells Christians to love non-Christians? I was wondering, because I've found many that say to love fellow-Christians, but I haven't found any that say to love non-believers.
I did find the one that says to "love your enemies", but what if the non-Christian isn't an enemy? What if you get along fine with them, and just have other beliefs? Does that scripture still apply?
Oh, keep in mind, I am talking about loving them in a non-romantic way.
I'm looking forward to hearing your opinions on this. :D

~ EJ


EJ

I have a great sermon on this subject which I think will answer most of the questions you asked above. I'll go find it and listen to it, then come back and put up a summary of it along with scripture references. In the meantime, allow me to give you a little bit of direction:

1) The scripture God used to bring me to a realization of the falsity of God's omnibenevolence: Romans 9:13.

2) If one is a committed Christian, so that Jesus is the most precious thing they treasure, then even a "nice" person with whom they get along is an enemy in at least ONE way: they have rejected and spurned the most precious thing. Therefore we pray for and love them.

However; as you say, this type of love is not "romantic". NOR is it permissive. It is committed to doing whatever is best for that person. The best thing for a person who is a non-Christian is to give them every opportunity to encounter Christ. Sometimes that means things like allowing them to suffer the consequences of their actions, like offending them with the gospel, refusing to allow them to injure and harm the weak and helpless, and breaking fellowship with them when they make it clear that they are willing to work toward compromising your standards. So sometimes "loving" them will not look like what the "world" calls "love".

It may be a day or so before I can summarize that sermon for you. I think it's up over at Sermonaudio.com, and if it is, I'll try to find it and post a link.

mm
Image
User avatar
Mother-Music
NarniaWeb Nut
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: United States
Gender: Female

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby stardf29 » Aug 01, 2010 9:37 pm

Indeed, the question of God's love is a tricky one. If I had more real-life time available to me, I'd give some detailed commentary--perhaps my own answer to each of Dr. Ransom's ten points--but as I don't, I shall have to offer some short points:

God certainly "loves" everyone, but not necessarily in the same way for each person.

Like many of the other concepts which our human minds can only comprehend as being mutually exclusive, there certainly is the possibility that "love" and "hate" can co-exist for God. (Although, what with our culture's... um, fascination for the "love-hate" relationship, we might not see that as so contradictory anyways...)

Also, and probably most importantly, by no means are any of us, Christian or not, in any way deserving of God's love. Even if there were to be some kind of competition for "best Christian" on this Earth, the winner of that competition is still, ultimately, a sinner. A sinner whose ultimate price has been paid off, sure, but while he/she's on Earth, a sinner.

Anyways, as a little off-side, I present an amusing look at the common person's annoyance of fundies. Be sure to hover your mouse over the picture for a bit, too. ;)
"A Series of Miracles", a blog about faith and anime.

Avatar: Kojiro Sasahara of Nichijou.
User avatar
stardf29
Moderator Emeritus
I'm on a goat.
 
Posts: 14353
Joined: Mar 11, 2005
Location: Waiting for you at our secret base...
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Mother-Music » Aug 03, 2010 10:56 am

Mother-Music wrote:
Eustace+Jill wrote:Hey, I had a question! :)
I don't really know what my opinion on this is yet, so I wanted to find out what you guys thought. I was wondering, (from a Christian, Bible-believing viewpoint) does God love non-Christians? I don't mean the world in general, or all people in general. I mean an individual who is not a Christian. (I don't know if that makes any difference whether it's one person or a mass, but just in case it makes a difference, I thought I'd specify)
I was wondering because I have seen scriptures that make it sound like he does (since he sent His son to die for them), and other scriptures that sound like he doesn't (because without Jesus's blood to cover them, he can't see past their sins). I don't believe that the Bible contradicts itself or anything like that. And I believe the Bible absolutely. I was just wondering what it meant. :)
Plus, are there any scriptures that tells Christians to love non-Christians? I was wondering, because I've found many that say to love fellow-Christians, but I haven't found any that say to love non-believers.
I did find the one that says to "love your enemies", but what if the non-Christian isn't an enemy? What if you get along fine with them, and just have other beliefs? Does that scripture still apply?
Oh, keep in mind, I am talking about loving them in a non-romantic way.
I'm looking forward to hearing your opinions on this. :D

~ EJ


EJ

I have a great sermon on this subject which I think will answer most of the questions you asked above. I'll go find it and listen to it, then come back and put up a summary of it along with scripture references. In the meantime, allow me to give you a little bit of direction:

1) The scripture God used to bring me to a realization of the falsity of God's omnibenevolence: Romans 9:13.

2) If one is a committed Christian, so that Jesus is the most precious thing they treasure, then even a "nice" person with whom they get along is an enemy in at least ONE way: they have rejected and spurned the most precious thing. Therefore we pray for and love them.

However; as you say, this type of love is not "romantic". NOR is it permissive. It is committed to doing whatever is best for that person. The best thing for a person who is a non-Christian is to give them every opportunity to encounter Christ. Sometimes that means things like allowing them to suffer the consequences of their actions, like offending them with the gospel, refusing to allow them to injure and harm the weak and helpless, and breaking fellowship with them when they make it clear that they are willing to work toward compromising your standards. So sometimes "loving" them will not look like what the "world" calls "love".

It may be a day or so before I can summarize that sermon for you. I think it's up over at Sermonaudio.com, and if it is, I'll try to find it and post a link.

mm


Well, I have returned defeated. :ymblushing: I don't know what sermon I am thinking of, but it is not the sermon I thought it was. I will have to do some more research.

mm
But really, Dr. R gave a great rundown above.
Image
User avatar
Mother-Music
NarniaWeb Nut
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: United States
Gender: Female

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby waggawerewolf27 » Aug 06, 2010 12:59 am

Dr Elwin Ransome wrote:Among most Christians, the default practice is to say (as some have said here!) that "God loves everyone."


stardf29 wrote:God certainly "loves" everyone, but not necessarily in the same way for each person.


Really? /:) What about the likes of Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and other similar monsters, some of whom may still be living? How could God show love to such as these? Even if like Torquemada of the Spanish Inquisition they profess Christianity, and commit their wrongdoing in the name of Christianity? Or Islam? Or whichever credo they espouse? Does God really love these sorts of people? Oh by the way, stardf29, I really liked that link you gave. I do agree that "Fundies" and atheists can be equally annoying. :D The question is, I still need to figure out why?

Dr Elwin Ransome wrote:One very big topic is not included in the above list: the previous discussion about eugenics. That kind of topic will not be allowed.

In the past NarniaWeb has had similar policies about the promotion of human slavery. The same is true for this viewpoint. NarniaWeb members have many different views and that is fine. We love discussion about them. But the moderator staff will not allow abject evil to be promoted.

This is not just something controversial or interesting to think or talk about, or write about online or on paper. Eugenics, the idea of strengthening the human race by killing certain people or preventing others from reproducing, is abject evil.

So are related implications, such as disallowing mentally disabled people to live.


Fair point. And I also concur with Gandalf's Beard's objections to this topic in his post, which ended the last discussion. Besides, mental illness in general, not only mental disability, is surely more a matter of 'There but for the grace of God go I'. There is a biological basis to some forms of mental illness, and it isn't clear how accidents or stressful situations play a part, as far as I know. Not everyone who has ever had a breakdown is someone who has indulged in drugs etc, or lived a horrible life.

As an aside, as a member of the dreaded "Baby Boomer" generation, I have a thing about the many pundits who didn't like "baby boomers" because after WW2 they were simply too numerous in birth, in childhood (where were the schools?), in marriage (how dare they want to reproduce, let alone to the extent their parents did?), in the workforce (they are taking all the jobs in a tight labour market) or in old age (how are we going to afford to keep all these oldies in retirement?).

Haven't you noticed that those who want others to stop reproducing, working, retiring etc, have no difficulty with wanting to live the life of Riley, themselves? No matter what the cost to the environment etc? Or is everyone I've met in my life a reader of Thomas Hobbes?
User avatar
waggawerewolf27
NarniaWeb Zealot
 
Posts: 8781
Joined: Sep 25, 2009
Location: Oz
Gender: Female

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby FencerforJesus » Aug 06, 2010 5:39 am

I've been away due to heavy involvement with a mission team this week, and I want to point something out that we discussed in our prayer time yesterday. It has to do with the Prodigal Son. Wagga, you ask about how God loves the mosters we often refer to in history. Well, does God love us based on performance? If that were the case, not a single one of us would have good standing. In God's eyes, all of us are guilty of murder, adultery, theft, idolotry, covetness, lying, and breakers of all 10 Commandments. The son in the Prodigal Son story based his return on his performance and reason. The Father based the son's return on his identity as a son. When we come under the Blood Covenant of Christ, we are adopted into God's family and are considered 'sons'. And that identity is what gives us his love.

There is something else. Every one of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. And the wages of sin is death. The is one and ONLY one thing that any of us truly deserve. And that is death. EVERYTHING and ANYTHING else is a gift of God that we do not deserve. We cannot earn life because we sinned, so anything that comes with the package of life, such as a job, a family, income, the things we do, is a gift of God. So we need to understand that God does not work on the merits of our performance and what we do. He looks at the heart and our true identity.
Be watching for the release of my spiritual warfare novel under a new title: "Call to Arms" by OakTara Publishing. A sequel (title TBD) will shortly follow.
FencerforJesus
NarniaWeb Zealot
 
Posts: 8912
Joined: May 25, 2005
Location: United States
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Lucy P. » Aug 06, 2010 12:09 pm

God loves everyone because we are His.
However, God can love certain people more than others in a different way-- those who are good to Him deserve more of His love, don't you think?
Part of God's love is just a given, another part can be- not be earned, exactly- but we can become worthy of it.

Darn. I'm not expressing myself very well. Does anyone understand what I'm trying to say?
Image
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
User avatar
Lucy P.
NarniaWeb Guru
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Nov 22, 2007
Location: Bletchley Park

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Dr Elwin Ransom » Aug 06, 2010 12:53 pm

I'm not sure I'm tracking well, Lucy P. :) I don't think you were meaning to imply that God's love is based on whether we just be really, really good, right?

"We" are His -- I'd agree, if you're referring to His people.

However, some people are not His people. We might safely assume, for example, that the villains wagga listed up there are not His people. Anyone could be as bad as they are -- and from God's perspective, we are! -- but there's no evidence God redeemed any of those villains before they died. For true Christians, there is evidence God has saved them.

The part about we can become worthy of receiving God's love doesn't match with what the Bible says. "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God," Romans 3:23 says. I'm guessing you know that verse.

Is it possible some of that we-can-earn-God belief has sneaked in? We are humans and sinful, so that can happen to the "best" of us. ;)

Maybe my post up there can help. It's long, but I hope its wording is clear! Even better, I hope it points to the Bible as the only real way we can know whether God loves some, and not others, or whether He has the right to "discriminate" in His love. And with the fact that all of us not only fall far short of being worthy of God's love, but don't deserve His glory, how does the Bible say people are saved and loved by God?
Image

Speculative Faith
Exploring epic stories for God's glory.
Blogs, guest authors, novel reviews, and features on hot fiction topics.
User avatar
Dr Elwin Ransom
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus, "... and he almost deserved it."
 
Posts: 3279
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
Location: United States
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Lucy P. » Aug 06, 2010 1:34 pm

Right, Dr.
I think what I mean to say is that God loves us unconditionally. Of course he loves us more the better we are as people (it wouldn't make sense if he didn't) but God even loves the souls in hell. God doesn't hate anybody. He hates their sins, of course, but He loves everyone. We couldn't ever repay His love, but we should try by obeying His commandments and giving our imperfect, human love back.
There. I think I've said it better.
Image
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
User avatar
Lucy P.
NarniaWeb Guru
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Nov 22, 2007
Location: Bletchley Park

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby Dr Elwin Ransom » Aug 06, 2010 2:39 pm

Thanks for clarifying that, Lucy P. Now I think I understand you better, and it turns out I wasn't misunderstanding you before, either. :)

How do you know "God loves us unconditionally"? Does the Bible say this?

I wonder also where the idea comes from that God loves people in Hell. The purpose of Hell is to punish those who hate and always will hate God

The part about trying to obey His commandments and give our imperfect love back -- I could almost agree with that! But the Bible is clear that unless we repent and admit our "righteousness" is worthless, we are counted among evil, reprobate, dead-in-sins human beings.

Unless we make this clear, we risk adding even more false Christians to churches. They may say only "God is love," and not remember the rest.

The Apostle Paul, in Romans 3, wrote:“None is righteous, no, not one;
no one understands;
no one seeks for God.
All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
no one does good,
not even one.”

Many Christians skip to the God-is-love parts, as if Jesus came to make things easier for everyone. But God's Law is still very much in effect. Jesus said in Matthew 5: 17, 20: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. ... For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.”

Jesus does not merely love us, as if He has gotten past all that Law stuff in the Old Testament. He raises the bar and expects more from people! What hope do we have? Only repenting and believing Him Himself.

Please, will you consider the verses I have included?

And please, also think about author Randy Alcorn's reminder that, based on clear Scripture, God is not just all-love (as if His holiness is swallowed up in His love). His character is all the same with Him: love, justice and all.

Randy Alcorn wrote:God's attributes of holiness, purity, and righteousness prompt him to hate evil, including some human attitudes and actions; and yes, even some people (see Deuteronomy 12:31; Proverbs 6:16-19; Jeremiah 44:4; Malachi 1:2-3). David writes, "He [God] is angry with the wicked every day" (Psalm 7:11, NLT). David also says, "You are not a God who takes pleasure in evil; with you the wicked cannot dwell. The arrogant cannot stand in your presence; you hate all who do wrong. You destroy those who tell lies; bloodthirsty and deceitful men the LORD abhors" (Psalm 5:4-6).

These statements make clear that our loving God won't allow the wicked to dwell in his presence. Certainly, he hates sin, but passages such as this go further by saying, "You hate all who do wrong." If we place God's love above his holiness, such statements will seem appalling. And they will seem especially jarring when we hear John, the "apostle of love," say something like, "Whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath remains [present tense] on him" (John 3:36).

from If God is Good; all brackets in original, but my own emphases added
Image

Speculative Faith
Exploring epic stories for God's glory.
Blogs, guest authors, novel reviews, and features on hot fiction topics.
User avatar
Dr Elwin Ransom
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus, "... and he almost deserved it."
 
Posts: 3279
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
Location: United States
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby perspicacity » Aug 10, 2010 10:56 pm

Well said, Dr Ransom.

General question to all: take a look at Romans 5:6-8. Anything seem off to you? Steve Caruso thinks there is and on his website he wrote:

In the Greek of the Book of Romans, there is the following passage:

Romans 5:7
For one would hardly die for a righteous δικαιος (dikaios; righteous, upright, lawful, or just) man; though perhaps for the good αγαθος (agathos) man someone would dare even to die.

Arguably this progression is not logical. If someone is not willing to die for a “righteous man,” why would they be willing to die for a “good” man instead? Interestingly enough, within the Syriac Peshitta, we see that where the Greek reads δικαιος (righteous, upright, lawful, or just), the Aramaic reads רשעיא (rashe`yâ) which in the Syriac dialect means “wicked.” This in turn makes the text of the Peshitta read:

Nor one would hardly die for a wicked רשעיא man; though perhaps for a good טבא (tâbâ’; good) man someone would dare even to die.

This progression makes a greater deal of logical sense, however such a diversion from a well established textual tradition is rather bold. Why would the compilers of the Peshitta do this? The answer may be within the letter /ע/ (`ayin). In the Estrangelo, Madnyaha, and Serto Alphabets, the letter /ע/ looks almost identical to the letter /נ/ (nûn) except for a difference of a mere 20 to 30° on their respective stems.

If we deliberately confuse /ע/ for /נ/, we get the word רשניא (reshnâyâ’) which does not mean “wicked” but “righteous, justice, lawmaker, ruler, or leader.” This could have been easily translated as δικαιος (righteous, upright, lawful, or just), as it would have been the least absurd of the possible renderings.

ܪܫܥܝܐ
(rashe`yâ; “wicked”)

ܪܫܢܝܐ
(reshnâyâ’; “righteous”)

Within the context of this passage, however, רשעיא (wicked) is arguably a more authentic reading, as we can see in the verses that surround this part of the pericope, the author is building a logical progression:

Romans 5
6 For while we were yet weak, at the right time the Christ died for the ungodly. 7 For one will hardly die for a wicked man. Yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. 8 But God commends his own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

If δικαιος (righteous) were the original reading, then it would seem to miss the context of the author’s words. The connundrum of salvation, according to him, rests within the fact that the Christ came and died for those who were unrighteous, sinners, and ungodly, not those who were upright in the eyes of God. רשעיא (wicked), therefore, is fits this argument, completing the three lines of parallelism and building upon the author’s theological concept laid down in verse 6.


The Aramaic primacy theory seems extremely unlikely to me, especially with Romans, but this passage is rather odd. Is this a solution searching for a problem or might there be something to it?
How do you tell a copy from the original?
User avatar
perspicacity
NarniaWeb Regular
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Jul 23, 2009
Gender: Male

Re: Christianity, Religion and Philosophy, Episode VI!

Postby DiGoRyKiRkE » Aug 11, 2010 4:29 pm

To be honest, looking at the context of the verse, it didn't really matter which word is used. It's obviously talking about Christ, and he died for all sinners (let's not start that debate again shall we ;) ). Whether the man is righteous (and his righteousness is as filthy rags) or whether the man was wicked (aren't all of us wicked?) it doesn't matter. Christ died for people of all backgrounds; no matter whether you're arminian or calvinist.

That being said; God says in his word that He will preserve it. If the word had been translated incorrectly, than God would have seen to it that it would have been corrected somewhere along the line. To say that there is an error in God's word is to say that His word is flawed, which, by extension, is to say that God is flawed.

I have to ask myself, perspicacity, why you brought this up. To me, it seems a bit odd that this sort of thing just fell out into the open.
Member of Ye Olde NarniaWeb
WC: Old Forum: 1024 New Forum: 240
User avatar
DiGoRyKiRkE
Moderator
The Logical Ornithological Mod
 
Posts: 23238
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: Ohio: The Buckeye State
Gender: Male

PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests